Post by account_disabled on Jan 11, 2024 7:39:37 GMT
the Rubello family for the construction built there. The São Paulo Court of Justice was favorable to the family that occupied the land. The Court recognized the acquisitive prescription, as the family has enjoyed the assets for a long time, and granted adverse possession. For the court, the claimed plot lost its characteristics as a family asset for more than 30 years. He also recognized that the sale and purchase document, already paid, was a fair title for the purpose of ordinary adverse possession. Luiz Piccolo's heirs filed a Special Appeal with the STJ, claiming that the property belongs to the family and is not subject to adverse possession. They argued that the other family did not have fair title,.
since the promise of sale and purchase presented would not have authentication, registration, signatures of buyers, witnesses, among other requirements. They also stated that Luiz Piccolo could not dispose of the property without his wife's consent. The rapporteur of the appeal, Minister Barros Monteiro, considered the paid-off sale and purchase commitment document to be va Phone Number List lid, even if without authentication or with other flaws. He also understood that the fact that the property was established as a family asset by Luiz Piccolo is not an impediment to adverse possession. Minister Barros Monteiro also highlighted that to examine the bad faith of the possessors it would be necessary to examine evidence, .
which is unacceptable in a Special Appeal.The Labor Court is responsible for judging labor lawsuits filed by registry office employees. The decision is from the 10th Panel of the Regional Labor Court of the 2nd Region (São Paulo). In the judges' understanding, although the notary's clerk performs state duties, he is not part of the public administration. The Panel determined that the 19th Labor Court of São Paulo judge the action of an employee of the 28th Notary's Office. The worker filed a lawsuit requesting payment of outstanding labor funds. The first instance accepted the registry office's arguments and did not consider the request as it understood that the Labor Court would not be competent to judge the case.
since the promise of sale and purchase presented would not have authentication, registration, signatures of buyers, witnesses, among other requirements. They also stated that Luiz Piccolo could not dispose of the property without his wife's consent. The rapporteur of the appeal, Minister Barros Monteiro, considered the paid-off sale and purchase commitment document to be va Phone Number List lid, even if without authentication or with other flaws. He also understood that the fact that the property was established as a family asset by Luiz Piccolo is not an impediment to adverse possession. Minister Barros Monteiro also highlighted that to examine the bad faith of the possessors it would be necessary to examine evidence, .
which is unacceptable in a Special Appeal.The Labor Court is responsible for judging labor lawsuits filed by registry office employees. The decision is from the 10th Panel of the Regional Labor Court of the 2nd Region (São Paulo). In the judges' understanding, although the notary's clerk performs state duties, he is not part of the public administration. The Panel determined that the 19th Labor Court of São Paulo judge the action of an employee of the 28th Notary's Office. The worker filed a lawsuit requesting payment of outstanding labor funds. The first instance accepted the registry office's arguments and did not consider the request as it understood that the Labor Court would not be competent to judge the case.